Top firms ranked
15
#1 firm's city score
470
Brighton Jones
Average city score
201.5
City scale — not the 0–100 national score
AI Visibility Report
See where your firm ranks
2
3
14Local Specialist
Ranks #1 here but #55 nationally — a genuinely local presence.
National rank
#55
National score
57.3/100
Avg. position here
4.2
Very good — typically in the top 5 when mentioned
AI platform breakdown · this metro
ChatGPT7%
32%
Perplexity11%
Gemini50%
Split between Gemini (50%) and Claude (32%) — 28 total mentions across 4 platforms.
2
15
2National Leader
Ranks #2 locally and #3 nationally — consistently high visibility across markets.
National rank
#3
National score
86.1/100
Avg. position here
6.9
Good — often in the top 10 when mentioned
AI platform breakdown · this metro
ChatGPT10%
10%
Perplexity71%
Gemini10%
Primarily visible on Perplexity (71%), with secondary presence on other platforms — 21 total mentions across 4 platforms.
0
15
2National Leader
Ranks #3 locally and #32 nationally — consistently high visibility across markets.
National rank
#32
National score
60.7/100
Avg. position here
5.0
Very good — typically in the top 5 when mentioned
AI platform breakdown · this metro
ChatGPT0%
6%
Perplexity83%
Gemini11%
Perplexity drives 83% of this firm's AI visibility in this city — 18 total mentions across 4 platforms.
2
3
3Local Focus
Ranks #4 in this city with no national ranking — AI visibility concentrated in local markets.
National rank
Not in top 300
National score
—
Avg. position here
5.9
Good — often in the top 10 when mentioned
AI platform breakdown · this metro
ChatGPT14%
43%
Perplexity21%
Gemini21%
Balanced visibility across 3 AI platforms — 14 total mentions across 4 platforms.
2
7
3National Leader
Ranks #5 locally and #18 nationally — consistently high visibility across markets.
National rank
#18
National score
68.0/100
Avg. position here
5.9
Good — often in the top 10 when mentioned
AI platform breakdown · this metro
ChatGPT15%
8%
Perplexity54%
Gemini23%
Mixed visibility across platforms — 13 total mentions across 4 platforms.
0
13
0National Leader
Ranks #6 locally and #13 nationally — consistently high visibility across markets.
National rank
#13
National score
71.0/100
Avg. position here
6.0
Good — often in the top 10 when mentioned
AI platform breakdown · this metro
ChatGPT0%
0%
Perplexity100%
Gemini0%
Perplexity drives 100% of this firm's AI visibility in this city — 13 total mentions across 4 platforms.
0
2
5Local Focus
Ranks #7 in this city with no national ranking — AI visibility concentrated in local markets.
National rank
Not in top 300
National score
—
Avg. position here
5.0
Very good — typically in the top 5 when mentioned
AI platform breakdown · this metro
ChatGPT0%
42%
Perplexity17%
Gemini42%
Balanced visibility across 3 AI platforms — 12 total mentions across 4 platforms.
1
0
5National Leader
Ranks #8 locally and #10 nationally — consistently high visibility across markets.
National rank
#10
National score
74.0/100
Avg. position here
5.1
Good — often in the top 10 when mentioned
AI platform breakdown · this metro
ChatGPT9%
45%
Perplexity0%
Gemini45%
Split between Claude (45%) and Gemini (45%) — 11 total mentions across 4 platforms.
0
1
5Local Focus
Ranks #9 in this city with no national ranking — AI visibility concentrated in local markets.
National rank
Not in top 300
National score
—
Avg. position here
5.9
Good — often in the top 10 when mentioned
AI platform breakdown · this metro
ChatGPT0%
45%
Perplexity9%
Gemini45%
Split between Claude (45%) and Gemini (45%) — 11 total mentions across 4 platforms.
3
1
4Local Specialist
Ranks #10 here but #240 nationally — a genuinely local presence.
National rank
#240
National score
49.1/100
Avg. position here
4.3
Very good — typically in the top 5 when mentioned
AI platform breakdown · this metro
ChatGPT30%
20%
Perplexity10%
Gemini40%
Balanced visibility across 3 AI platforms — 10 total mentions across 4 platforms.
1
0
4Consistent Performer
Ranks #11 locally and #1 nationally — consistent visibility across markets.
National rank
#1
National score
89.7/100
Avg. position here
5.2
Good — often in the top 10 when mentioned
AI platform breakdown · this metro
ChatGPT10%
50%
Perplexity0%
Gemini40%
Split between Claude (50%) and Gemini (40%) — 10 total mentions across 4 platforms.
1
1
6Local Focus
Ranks #12 in this city with no national ranking — AI visibility concentrated in local markets.
National rank
Not in top 300
National score
—
Avg. position here
5.6
Good — often in the top 10 when mentioned
AI platform breakdown · this metro
ChatGPT11%
11%
Perplexity11%
Gemini67%
Primarily visible on Gemini (67%), with secondary presence on other platforms — 9 total mentions across 4 platforms.
0
2
3Consistent Performer
Ranks #13 locally and #8 nationally — consistent visibility across markets.
National rank
#8
National score
76.1/100
Avg. position here
7.0
Good — often in the top 10 when mentioned
AI platform breakdown · this metro
ChatGPT0%
44%
Perplexity22%
Gemini33%
Balanced visibility across 3 AI platforms — 9 total mentions across 4 platforms.
4
1
2Consistent Performer
Ranks #14 locally and #6 nationally — consistent visibility across markets.
National rank
#6
National score
79.6/100
Avg. position here
8.8
Good — often in the top 10 when mentioned
AI platform breakdown · this metro
ChatGPT44%
22%
Perplexity11%
Gemini22%
Balanced visibility across 3 AI platforms — 9 total mentions across 4 platforms.
1
0
2Local Focus
Ranks #15 in this city with no national ranking — AI visibility concentrated in local markets.
National rank
Not in top 300
National score
—
Avg. position here
4.4
Very good — typically in the top 5 when mentioned
AI platform breakdown · this metro
ChatGPT13%
63%
Perplexity0%
Gemini25%
Primarily visible on Claude (63%), with secondary presence on other platforms — 8 total mentions across 4 platforms.
Showing Seattle's top 15 — every listed firm is a registered investment adviser, verified against the SEC/state Form ADV registry. Firms below the cutoff are still tracked: search any firm name above.
How to read a grade
Disclaimer
This is independent research, not investment advice or an endorsement. Scores measure how often and how prominently AI assistants surface a firm as of September 15, 2026 — not its competence, credentials, performance, or fit for any client. Rankings reflect clean, non-personalized queries and may differ from what any individual user sees. AdvisorFinder is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Perplexity; their names and logos identify the tools we test.
This board ranks independent RIA firms only. National wirehouses, banks, broker-dealers, and asset managers — Morgan Stanley, Merrill, Charles Schwab, Fidelity, Vanguard, and similar — are out of scope by design: they compete in a different category, and their household-brand ubiquity in AI answers would turn an independent-advisor ranking into a big-brand recognition contest. Independent advisor teams affiliated with those institutions are evaluated as their own firms.
Scores and ranks are recomputed each edition from a fixed query library. Because assistant outputs vary run to run, small movement between editions is expected — rank changes outside the top 25 are shown as approximate. See the full methodology, or request a correction.