Who do AI assistants recommend in San Francisco, CA?

    The top 15 firms AI assistants name for San Francisco — each a verified registered investment adviser — from 100 location-specific queries across the four major platforms.

    100 city queries1 of 64 covered metrosUpdated September 15, 2026 · Methodology

    Top firms ranked

    15

    #1 firm's city score

    386

    Aspiriant

    Average city score

    182.0

    City scale — not the 0–100 national score

    AI Visibility Report

    See where your firm ranks

    $199 one-time
    🌎

    National Leader

    Ranks #1 locally and #34 nationally — consistently high visibility across markets.

    National rank

    #34

    National score

    60.2/100

    Avg. position here

    4.9

    Very good — typically in the top 5 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    4%

    Mentions1
    ClaudeClaude

    25%

    Mentions6
    PerplexityPerplexity

    33%

    Mentions8
    GeminiGemini

    38%

    Mentions9

    Balanced visibility across 3 AI platforms — 24 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    🌎

    National Leader

    Ranks #2 locally and #2 nationally — consistently high visibility across markets.

    National rank

    #2

    National score

    87.2/100

    Avg. position here

    7.3

    Good — often in the top 10 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    0%

    Mentions0
    ClaudeClaude

    12%

    Mentions2
    PerplexityPerplexity

    76%

    Mentions13
    GeminiGemini

    12%

    Mentions2

    Primarily visible on Perplexity (76%), with secondary presence on other platforms — 17 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    🏠

    Local Specialist

    Ranks #3 here but #267 nationally — a genuinely local presence.

    National rank

    #267

    National score

    48.6/100

    Avg. position here

    3.3

    Very good — typically in the top 5 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    13%

    Mentions2
    ClaudeClaude

    44%

    Mentions7
    PerplexityPerplexity

    19%

    Mentions3
    GeminiGemini

    25%

    Mentions4

    Balanced visibility across 3 AI platforms — 16 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    🌎

    National Leader

    Ranks #4 locally and #1 nationally — consistently high visibility across markets.

    National rank

    #1

    National score

    89.7/100

    Avg. position here

    7.1

    Good — often in the top 10 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    20%

    Mentions3
    ClaudeClaude

    27%

    Mentions4
    PerplexityPerplexity

    20%

    Mentions3
    GeminiGemini

    33%

    Mentions5

    Balanced visibility across 4 AI platforms — 15 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    🏠

    Local Specialist

    Ranks #5 here but #210 nationally — a genuinely local presence.

    National rank

    #210

    National score

    49.7/100

    Avg. position here

    4.6

    Very good — typically in the top 5 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    23%

    Mentions3
    ClaudeClaude

    31%

    Mentions4
    PerplexityPerplexity

    15%

    Mentions2
    GeminiGemini

    31%

    Mentions4

    Balanced visibility across 3 AI platforms — 13 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    📍

    Local Focus

    Ranks #6 in this city with no national ranking — AI visibility concentrated in local markets.

    National rank

    Not in top 300

    National score

    —

    Avg. position here

    7.0

    Good — often in the top 10 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    15%

    Mentions2
    ClaudeClaude

    8%

    Mentions1
    PerplexityPerplexity

    46%

    Mentions6
    GeminiGemini

    31%

    Mentions4

    Mixed visibility across platforms — 13 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    🌎

    National Leader

    Ranks #7 locally and #48 nationally — consistently high visibility across markets.

    National rank

    #48

    National score

    57.9/100

    Avg. position here

    4.9

    Very good — typically in the top 5 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    10%

    Mentions1
    ClaudeClaude

    20%

    Mentions2
    PerplexityPerplexity

    50%

    Mentions5
    GeminiGemini

    20%

    Mentions2

    Balanced visibility across 3 AI platforms — 10 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    📍

    Local Focus

    Ranks #8 in this city with no national ranking — AI visibility concentrated in local markets.

    National rank

    Not in top 300

    National score

    —

    Avg. position here

    4.9

    Very good — typically in the top 5 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    0%

    Mentions0
    ClaudeClaude

    0%

    Mentions0
    PerplexityPerplexity

    70%

    Mentions7
    GeminiGemini

    30%

    Mentions3

    Primarily visible on Perplexity (70%), with secondary presence on other platforms — 10 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    📍

    Local Focus

    Ranks #9 in this city with no national ranking — AI visibility concentrated in local markets.

    National rank

    Not in top 300

    National score

    —

    Avg. position here

    5.3

    Good — often in the top 10 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    0%

    Mentions0
    ClaudeClaude

    70%

    Mentions7
    PerplexityPerplexity

    0%

    Mentions0
    GeminiGemini

    30%

    Mentions3

    Primarily visible on Claude (70%), with secondary presence on other platforms — 10 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    🏠

    Local Specialist

    Ranks #10 here but #110 nationally — a genuinely local presence.

    National rank

    #110

    National score

    53.3/100

    Avg. position here

    6.9

    Good — often in the top 10 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    22%

    Mentions2
    ClaudeClaude

    22%

    Mentions2
    PerplexityPerplexity

    22%

    Mentions2
    GeminiGemini

    33%

    Mentions3

    Balanced visibility across 4 AI platforms — 9 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    📍

    Local Focus

    Ranks #11 in this city with no national ranking — AI visibility concentrated in local markets.

    National rank

    Not in top 300

    National score

    —

    Avg. position here

    4.0

    Very good — typically in the top 5 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    25%

    Mentions2
    ClaudeClaude

    25%

    Mentions2
    PerplexityPerplexity

    13%

    Mentions1
    GeminiGemini

    38%

    Mentions3

    Balanced visibility across 3 AI platforms — 8 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    📍

    Local Focus

    Ranks #12 in this city with no national ranking — AI visibility concentrated in local markets.

    National rank

    Not in top 300

    National score

    —

    Avg. position here

    5.8

    Good — often in the top 10 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    0%

    Mentions0
    ClaudeClaude

    13%

    Mentions1
    PerplexityPerplexity

    0%

    Mentions0
    GeminiGemini

    88%

    Mentions7

    Gemini drives 88% of this firm's AI visibility in this city — 8 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    📍

    Local Focus

    Ranks #13 in this city with no national ranking — AI visibility concentrated in local markets.

    National rank

    Not in top 300

    National score

    —

    Avg. position here

    3.6

    Very good — typically in the top 5 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    14%

    Mentions1
    ClaudeClaude

    43%

    Mentions3
    PerplexityPerplexity

    0%

    Mentions0
    GeminiGemini

    43%

    Mentions3

    Split between Claude (43%) and Gemini (43%) — 7 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    📍

    Local Focus

    Ranks #14 in this city with no national ranking — AI visibility concentrated in local markets.

    National rank

    Not in top 300

    National score

    —

    Avg. position here

    3.7

    Very good — typically in the top 5 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    14%

    Mentions1
    ClaudeClaude

    0%

    Mentions0
    PerplexityPerplexity

    71%

    Mentions5
    GeminiGemini

    14%

    Mentions1

    Primarily visible on Perplexity (71%), with secondary presence on other platforms — 7 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    📍

    Local Focus

    Ranks #15 in this city with no national ranking — AI visibility concentrated in local markets.

    National rank

    Not in top 300

    National score

    —

    Avg. position here

    4.3

    Very good — typically in the top 5 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    0%

    Mentions0
    ClaudeClaude

    14%

    Mentions1
    PerplexityPerplexity

    71%

    Mentions5
    GeminiGemini

    14%

    Mentions1

    Primarily visible on Perplexity (71%), with secondary presence on other platforms — 7 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    Showing San Francisco's top 15 — every listed firm is a registered investment adviser, verified against the SEC/state Form ADV registry. Firms below the cutoff are still tracked: search any firm name above.

    How to read a grade

    AConsistently recommendedBFrequently visibleCEmerging visibilityDRarely surfacedFEffectively invisible

    Disclaimer

    This is independent research, not investment advice or an endorsement. Scores measure how often and how prominently AI assistants surface a firm as of September 15, 2026 — not its competence, credentials, performance, or fit for any client. Rankings reflect clean, non-personalized queries and may differ from what any individual user sees. AdvisorFinder is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Perplexity; their names and logos identify the tools we test.

    This board ranks independent RIA firms only. National wirehouses, banks, broker-dealers, and asset managers — Morgan Stanley, Merrill, Charles Schwab, Fidelity, Vanguard, and similar — are out of scope by design: they compete in a different category, and their household-brand ubiquity in AI answers would turn an independent-advisor ranking into a big-brand recognition contest. Independent advisor teams affiliated with those institutions are evaluated as their own firms.

    Scores and ranks are recomputed each edition from a fixed query library. Because assistant outputs vary run to run, small movement between editions is expected — rank changes outside the top 25 are shown as approximate. See the full methodology, or request a correction.