Who do AI assistants recommend in Los Angeles, CA?

    The top 15 firms AI assistants name for Los Angeles — each a verified registered investment adviser — from 100 location-specific queries across the four major platforms.

    100 city queries1 of 64 covered metrosUpdated September 15, 2026 · Methodology

    Top firms ranked

    15

    #1 firm's city score

    495

    EP Wealth Advisors

    Average city score

    187.5

    City scale — not the 0–100 national score

    AI Visibility Report

    See where your firm ranks

    $199 one-time
    🌎

    National Leader

    Ranks #1 locally and #10 nationally — consistently high visibility across markets.

    National rank

    #10

    National score

    74.0/100

    Avg. position here

    4.5

    Very good — typically in the top 5 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    10%

    Mentions3
    ClaudeClaude

    17%

    Mentions5
    PerplexityPerplexity

    37%

    Mentions11
    GeminiGemini

    37%

    Mentions11

    Balanced visibility across 3 AI platforms — 30 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    🌎

    National Leader

    Ranks #2 locally and #13 nationally — consistently high visibility across markets.

    National rank

    #13

    National score

    71.0/100

    Avg. position here

    6.9

    Good — often in the top 10 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    6%

    Mentions1
    ClaudeClaude

    0%

    Mentions0
    PerplexityPerplexity

    59%

    Mentions10
    GeminiGemini

    35%

    Mentions6

    Split between Perplexity (59%) and Gemini (35%) — 17 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    🌎

    National Leader

    Ranks #3 locally and #49 nationally — consistently high visibility across markets.

    National rank

    #49

    National score

    57.9/100

    Avg. position here

    4.1

    Very good — typically in the top 5 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    7%

    Mentions1
    ClaudeClaude

    13%

    Mentions2
    PerplexityPerplexity

    60%

    Mentions9
    GeminiGemini

    20%

    Mentions3

    Mixed visibility across platforms — 15 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    🌎

    National Leader

    Ranks #4 locally and #8 nationally — consistently high visibility across markets.

    National rank

    #8

    National score

    76.1/100

    Avg. position here

    6.1

    Good — often in the top 10 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    7%

    Mentions1
    ClaudeClaude

    40%

    Mentions6
    PerplexityPerplexity

    27%

    Mentions4
    GeminiGemini

    27%

    Mentions4

    Balanced visibility across 3 AI platforms — 15 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    📍

    Local Focus

    Ranks #5 in this city with no national ranking — AI visibility concentrated in local markets.

    National rank

    Not in top 300

    National score

    —

    Avg. position here

    6.7

    Good — often in the top 10 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    0%

    Mentions0
    ClaudeClaude

    53%

    Mentions8
    PerplexityPerplexity

    0%

    Mentions0
    GeminiGemini

    47%

    Mentions7

    Split between Claude (53%) and Gemini (47%) — 15 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    🌎

    National Leader

    Ranks #6 locally and #34 nationally — consistently high visibility across markets.

    National rank

    #34

    National score

    60.2/100

    Avg. position here

    7.2

    Good — often in the top 10 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    25%

    Mentions3
    ClaudeClaude

    17%

    Mentions2
    PerplexityPerplexity

    0%

    Mentions0
    GeminiGemini

    58%

    Mentions7

    Balanced visibility across 3 AI platforms — 12 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    🌎

    National Leader

    Ranks #7 locally and #1 nationally — consistently high visibility across markets.

    National rank

    #1

    National score

    89.7/100

    Avg. position here

    7.6

    Good — often in the top 10 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    8%

    Mentions1
    ClaudeClaude

    58%

    Mentions7
    PerplexityPerplexity

    8%

    Mentions1
    GeminiGemini

    25%

    Mentions3

    Split between Claude (58%) and Gemini (25%) — 12 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    🌎

    National Leader

    Ranks #8 locally and #32 nationally — consistently high visibility across markets.

    National rank

    #32

    National score

    60.7/100

    Avg. position here

    5.3

    Good — often in the top 10 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    0%

    Mentions0
    ClaudeClaude

    36%

    Mentions4
    PerplexityPerplexity

    36%

    Mentions4
    GeminiGemini

    27%

    Mentions3

    Balanced visibility across 3 AI platforms — 11 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    📍

    Local Focus

    Ranks #9 in this city with no national ranking — AI visibility concentrated in local markets.

    National rank

    Not in top 300

    National score

    —

    Avg. position here

    6.2

    Good — often in the top 10 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    0%

    Mentions0
    ClaudeClaude

    45%

    Mentions5
    PerplexityPerplexity

    45%

    Mentions5
    GeminiGemini

    9%

    Mentions1

    Split between Claude (45%) and Perplexity (45%) — 11 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    🌎

    National Leader

    Ranks #10 locally and #3 nationally — consistently high visibility across markets.

    National rank

    #3

    National score

    86.1/100

    Avg. position here

    6.0

    Good — often in the top 10 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    20%

    Mentions2
    ClaudeClaude

    20%

    Mentions2
    PerplexityPerplexity

    30%

    Mentions3
    GeminiGemini

    30%

    Mentions3

    Balanced visibility across 4 AI platforms — 10 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    📊

    Consistent Performer

    Ranks #11 locally and #5 nationally — consistent visibility across markets.

    National rank

    #5

    National score

    80.6/100

    Avg. position here

    6.1

    Good — often in the top 10 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    22%

    Mentions2
    ClaudeClaude

    56%

    Mentions5
    PerplexityPerplexity

    0%

    Mentions0
    GeminiGemini

    22%

    Mentions2

    Balanced visibility across 3 AI platforms — 9 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    📍

    Local Focus

    Ranks #12 in this city with no national ranking — AI visibility concentrated in local markets.

    National rank

    Not in top 300

    National score

    —

    Avg. position here

    12.0

    Moderate — typically positions 10–20

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    0%

    Mentions0
    ClaudeClaude

    56%

    Mentions5
    PerplexityPerplexity

    11%

    Mentions1
    GeminiGemini

    33%

    Mentions3

    Split between Claude (56%) and Gemini (33%) — 9 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    📊

    Consistent Performer

    Ranks #13 locally and #2 nationally — consistent visibility across markets.

    National rank

    #2

    National score

    87.2/100

    Avg. position here

    6.3

    Good — often in the top 10 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    0%

    Mentions0
    ClaudeClaude

    25%

    Mentions2
    PerplexityPerplexity

    13%

    Mentions1
    GeminiGemini

    63%

    Mentions5

    Primarily visible on Gemini (63%), with secondary presence on other platforms — 8 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    📍

    Local Focus

    Ranks #14 in this city with no national ranking — AI visibility concentrated in local markets.

    National rank

    Not in top 300

    National score

    —

    Avg. position here

    3.4

    Very good — typically in the top 5 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    0%

    Mentions0
    ClaudeClaude

    14%

    Mentions1
    PerplexityPerplexity

    14%

    Mentions1
    GeminiGemini

    71%

    Mentions5

    Primarily visible on Gemini (71%), with secondary presence on other platforms — 7 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    📍

    Local Focus

    Ranks #15 in this city with no national ranking — AI visibility concentrated in local markets.

    National rank

    Not in top 300

    National score

    —

    Avg. position here

    4.1

    Very good — typically in the top 5 when mentioned

    AI platform breakdown · this metro

    ChatGPTChatGPT

    0%

    Mentions0
    ClaudeClaude

    29%

    Mentions2
    PerplexityPerplexity

    71%

    Mentions5
    GeminiGemini

    0%

    Mentions0

    Primarily visible on Perplexity (71%), with secondary presence on other platforms — 7 total mentions across 4 platforms.

    Showing Los Angeles's top 15 — every listed firm is a registered investment adviser, verified against the SEC/state Form ADV registry. Firms below the cutoff are still tracked: search any firm name above.

    How to read a grade

    AConsistently recommendedBFrequently visibleCEmerging visibilityDRarely surfacedFEffectively invisible

    Disclaimer

    This is independent research, not investment advice or an endorsement. Scores measure how often and how prominently AI assistants surface a firm as of September 15, 2026 — not its competence, credentials, performance, or fit for any client. Rankings reflect clean, non-personalized queries and may differ from what any individual user sees. AdvisorFinder is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Perplexity; their names and logos identify the tools we test.

    This board ranks independent RIA firms only. National wirehouses, banks, broker-dealers, and asset managers — Morgan Stanley, Merrill, Charles Schwab, Fidelity, Vanguard, and similar — are out of scope by design: they compete in a different category, and their household-brand ubiquity in AI answers would turn an independent-advisor ranking into a big-brand recognition contest. Independent advisor teams affiliated with those institutions are evaluated as their own firms.

    Scores and ranks are recomputed each edition from a fixed query library. Because assistant outputs vary run to run, small movement between editions is expected — rank changes outside the top 25 are shown as approximate. See the full methodology, or request a correction.